Consulting Services
I advise film, television, and documentary teams on law enforcement portrayals where judgment and consequence meaningfully support the story.
Independent Evidence Review
Objective review of evidence, case materials, and investigative details to assess realism, procedural accuracy, and narrative plausibility.
I review case materials, evidence, and investigative details to assess whether what’s on the page or screen aligns with real-world law enforcement practice. My focus is on identifying gaps, oversimplifications, or inconsistencies that could undermine credibility if left unaddressed.
The goal is not to audit every detail, but to clarify what matters most for realism, narrative coherence, and informed storytelling choices.
Expert Reports & Affidavits
Clear, structured written guidance that explains complex law enforcement procedures, decisions, and implications in plain, production-ready language.
I provide guidance that translates complex law enforcement procedures and consequences into language creative teams can actually use. These materials are designed to support development, revision, or internal alignment without overwhelming the story with technical detail.
The emphasis is on clarity and judgment — explaining what would realistically happen, why it matters, and where creative flexibility exists.
Court Testimony
Consulting support on courtroom scenes, testimony dynamics, and examination processes to ensure portrayals reflect real-world practice and pressure.
I advise on courtroom scenes and testimony dynamics to ensure they reflect how officers, experts, and attorneys actually communicate under scrutiny. This includes how questions are framed, how answers are given, and how pressure, hesitation, and authority realistically show up on the stand.
My focus is on helping scenes feel credible and tense without relying on exaggerated exchanges or implausible courtroom shortcuts.
Forensic Consulting & Strategy
Evaluation of investigative methods and law enforcement approaches to guide story direction, character decision-making, and realistic outcomes.
I analyze investigative methods and law enforcement approaches to help productions shape case progression and decision-making. This includes how evidence is gathered, interpreted, challenged, and acted on over time.
My role is to advise on investigative logic and consequence so stories unfold in ways that feel grounded, credible, and coherent — without sacrificing narrative tension.
Each engagement is shaped by the project and the moment it’s in. I’m often asked to step in when productions are under time pressure and need a grounded perspective without overcorrection.
I collaborate closely with writers, directors, and producers, offering context and judgment around law enforcement behavior, procedure, and consequence as they relate to story and character.
Whether the support is brief or ongoing, the focus remains on practicality, restraint, and helping teams move ahead with confidence.
Projects that prioritize spectacle over plausibility, or that require deliberate distortion of law enforcement realities, generally fall outside my scope.
If you’re working on a police-centered story and would like a grounded perspective, I’d be glad to talk.
If you’re working on a police-centered story and would like a grounded perspective, I’d be glad to talk.
